Mathematical Psychology
About

Urgency-Gating Model

The urgency-gating model proposes that decision making involves a time-varying urgency signal that multiplies momentary evidence, producing collapsing effective boundaries and explaining deadline effects.

The urgency-gating model, developed by Cisek, Puskas, and El-Murr (2009), proposes that decisions are driven not by accumulated evidence but by the product of momentary evidence and a time-increasing urgency signal. This architecture produces behavior equivalent to collapsing decision boundaries — the effective threshold for responding decreases over time — and naturally explains why decision makers become less selective as time pressure increases.

Model Formulation

Urgency-Gating Model Decision variable: y(t) = u(t) · e(t) + noise

u(t) = urgency signal (increasing with time)
e(t) = momentary evidence (not accumulated)
Respond when y(t) exceeds threshold

Collapsing Bounds

Traditional accumulator models assume fixed decision boundaries. The urgency-gating model effectively implements collapsing bounds: as the urgency signal grows, weaker evidence becomes sufficient to trigger a response. This produces faster but less accurate decisions under time pressure without explicitly changing the threshold. The model accounts for findings that are difficult for fixed-boundary models, including speed-accuracy tradeoff curves that do not asymptote and neural evidence showing urgency-like signals in premotor and parietal cortex that ramp up independently of stimulus information.

Related Topics

References

  1. Cisek, P., Puskas, G. A., & El-Murr, S. (2009). Decisions in changing conditions: The urgency-gating model. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(37), 11560–11571. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1844-09.2009
  2. Thura, D., Beauregard-Racine, J., Fraber, C.-W., & Bhatt, P. (2012). Decision making by urgency gating: Theory and experimental support. Journal of Neurophysiology, 108(11), 2912–2930. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01071.2011
  3. Hawkins, G. E., Forstmann, B. U., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Ratcliff, R., & Brown, S. D. (2015). Revisiting the evidence for collapsing boundaries and urgency signals in perceptual decision-making. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(6), 2476–2484. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2410-14.2015
  4. Churchland, A. K., Kiani, R., & Shadlen, M. N. (2008). Decision-making with multiple alternatives. Nature Neuroscience, 11(6), 693–702. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2123

External Links